eucalyptus
equal parts staggering and mindnumbing: an e-book reader with, at first blush, substantially better design and UI than stanza and kindle is rejected because it allows users to download the kama sutra - which, for the record, you can download with stanza. is it possible to view this as anything but censorship? is apple shooting themselves in the foot by not posting a paid app that i would have immediately purchased (purchased!) to replace stanza? now i feel bad that i’ve given any money to the app store.
imho it’s officially gone too far. given the app store ToS, i’m pretty sure there’s no way that this is actually legal - or if it is, common sense revolts at the idea that it should be.
demand transparency and verboseness from apple today. nobody else will do it for you.
